B) global warming and the wine industry
C)what i liked is that i had a acceptable knowledge on the subject, that i studied, i had a creative introduction.
D) more sources each member said that..
E)compared to prior reviews it had the same high score which i think i don't deserve because i think my speech was poor, and in most of my speeches i would give myself high c's at best.
F) adding in time to know enough on my subject so i can explain each main point in more detail.
A) William Peete 4/22/13
B)Code of conduct for the UFC
C)I was able to learn a lot about my topic but i have difficulty expressing it do to a mess of note cards that i wrote my whole speech on because i wanted to make sure i poke mo than 6 minutes and a lot of quotes from my sources.
D)Work on conclusion and restate main points get more organizational work with less note cards.
E)i feel like this one i new more about it and could of just talked but do to my grape mishap i decided to put everything i wanted to gt a cross down and that hindered me because my notes were not in the correct order and i was forced to drop complete paragraphs.
F)i want to work one getting to know what i want to say in my mind and not be so hectic when wanting to get all my points across leading to written down rambling.
A) William Peete 4/24/13
B) Budget sequestration of 2013.
C)I liked the overall time of 9:09, i liked that i knew enough about the topic i did not have to stare at my note cards.
D) need to have a clear closer and a call to action, work on transitions.
E)this one i feel like i actually did well, and i had confidence in what i was saying. what i unproved on was i was able to keep speaking without breaks.
F)need to work on getting of notes more, and not write 80% of what i want to say down.
A
